Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1971 - 1980 of 4124 for in q.
Search results 1971 - 1980 of 4124 for in q.
COURT OF APPEALS
-examination of Jordan following questions suggesting that Jordan and Hehn were merely fighting: Q Well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46730 - 2010-02-08
-examination of Jordan following questions suggesting that Jordan and Hehn were merely fighting: Q Well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46730 - 2010-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a 7 Specifically, the exchange between defense counsel and Officer Donley went as follows: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=530392 - 2022-06-09
a 7 Specifically, the exchange between defense counsel and Officer Donley went as follows: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=530392 - 2022-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Perry A. Felton
.” Q. Okay. And did he hand the phone over to you? A. No. Q. Did you say you wanted to talk to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6831 - 2017-09-20
.” Q. Okay. And did he hand the phone over to you? A. No. Q. Did you say you wanted to talk to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6831 - 2017-09-20
Dane County v. Gregory R.
regarding his reasons for waiving the fourth peremptory strike: Q Did you have a particular reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14065 - 2005-03-31
regarding his reasons for waiving the fourth peremptory strike: Q Did you have a particular reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14065 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey L. Woodson v. Marie E. Kreutzer
the Kreutzer vehicle was still in the southbound lane of County Y. On cross-examination, he testified: Q. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9823 - 2005-03-31
the Kreutzer vehicle was still in the southbound lane of County Y. On cross-examination, he testified: Q. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9823 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the cross-examination of Patrick: Q. So it’s possible your father could have thrown a snowball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43962 - 2009-11-30
to the cross-examination of Patrick: Q. So it’s possible your father could have thrown a snowball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43962 - 2009-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
testified as follows regarding her encounter with Hart after he left the salvage yard: Q So he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11
testified as follows regarding her encounter with Hart after he left the salvage yard: Q So he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11
Wendy S. Zeka v. Gary R. Zeka
, testified as follows: Q. Last one on this part; $1,500 motorcycle. What kind of motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3204 - 2005-03-31
, testified as follows: Q. Last one on this part; $1,500 motorcycle. What kind of motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
his insufficiency-of-evidence claim by pointing to the cross-examination of Patrick: Q. So it’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43962 - 2014-09-15
his insufficiency-of-evidence claim by pointing to the cross-examination of Patrick: Q. So it’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43962 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shannan M. Nipple
(Ct. App. 1979), rev’d on other grounds, 101 Wis.2d 79, 303 N.W.2d 633 (1981). [2] “Q. [I]f Shannan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1979), rev’d on other grounds, 101 Wis.2d 79, 303 N.W.2d 633 (1981). [2] “Q. [I]f Shannan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31