Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1971 - 1980 of 6749 for mix.
Search results 1971 - 1980 of 6749 for mix.
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
U.S. 52, 59 (1985) (footnote omitted). This presents a mixed question of fact and law. Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
U.S. 52, 59 (1985) (footnote omitted). This presents a mixed question of fact and law. Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
State v. Harold G. Curlee
to suppress his confession under a mixed standard of review. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 343–344
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7188 - 2005-03-31
to suppress his confession under a mixed standard of review. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 343–344
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7188 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to a hearing for the relief requested is subject to a mixed standard of review. State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15
the defendant to a hearing for the relief requested is subject to a mixed standard of review. State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there is some basis for recovery.’” United Concrete & Constr., Inc. v. Red–D–Mix Concrete, Inc., 2013 WI 72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
that there is some basis for recovery.’” United Concrete & Constr., Inc. v. Red–D–Mix Concrete, Inc., 2013 WI 72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Harold G. Curlee
court’s decision on Curlee’s motion to suppress his confession under a mixed standard of review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7188 - 2017-09-20
court’s decision on Curlee’s motion to suppress his confession under a mixed standard of review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7188 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Westcott
performance prejudiced the defendant. See id. Both components of the standard are mixed questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
performance prejudiced the defendant. See id. Both components of the standard are mixed questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, but south of the fence. ¶5 Adverse possession issues raise mixed questions of fact and law. Klinefelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26848 - 2014-09-15
, but south of the fence. ¶5 Adverse possession issues raise mixed questions of fact and law. Klinefelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26848 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ivan C. Mitchell
is sufficiently undermined. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. These questions present mixed questions of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21487 - 2017-09-21
is sufficiently undermined. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. These questions present mixed questions of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“Whether the State breached a plea agreement is a mixed question of fact and law.” Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110255 - 2017-09-21
“Whether the State breached a plea agreement is a mixed question of fact and law.” Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110255 - 2017-09-21
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
the trial court's decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction motion using a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction motion using a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31