Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 81979 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] State v. Nicole Lopez
field sobriety tests, Lopez initially refused and asked Reilly to leave. Reilly concluded that Lopez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4513 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARY M. KUHNMUENCH, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123252 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: mary m. kuhnmuench, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610712 - 2023-01-18

State v. Casey J. Shelton
Niles asked Shelton to step out of his car to perform field sobriety tests, which Niles had been trained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3930 - 2011-12-11

2008 WI APP 175
. The admission of the agent’s expert testimony met the standards of the relevancy test that Wisconsin uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34646 - 2008-12-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: GLENN H. YAMAHIRO and WILLIAM S. POCAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas K. Malmquist
the refusal hearing. The trial court, while ordering sequestration of witnesses at each proceeding, viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11575 - 2017-09-19

State v. Thomas K. Malmquist
following the refusal hearing. The trial court, while ordering sequestration of witnesses at each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11575 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. and Elizabeth A. T., Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27367 - 2006-12-11