Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 19711 - 19720 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
943.32(2), 940.305(2) (2017-18). The trial court imposed three twenty-five-year terms of imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
943.32(2), 940.305(2) (2017-18). The trial court imposed three twenty-five-year terms of imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
enhancer. He pled not guilty and the case proceeded to a jury trial. ¶3 Before trial, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932573 - 2025-03-26
enhancer. He pled not guilty and the case proceeded to a jury trial. ¶3 Before trial, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932573 - 2025-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Michael Crawford
conduct. He raises several issues for review: (1) whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction to try him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11406 - 2017-09-19
conduct. He raises several issues for review: (1) whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction to try him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11406 - 2017-09-19
Pekin Insurance Company v. H. Fuller & Sons, Inc.
that discovery problems continued after this hearing and that it was forced to seek an adjournment of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8383 - 2005-03-31
that discovery problems continued after this hearing and that it was forced to seek an adjournment of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Cole-Bey
argues that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the real controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4637 - 2017-09-19
argues that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the real controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4637 - 2017-09-19
Irene M. Oravecz v. The Medical Protective Co.
. PER CURIAM. Irene M. Oravecz and her husband, Steve Oravecz, appeal from the trial court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11956 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Irene M. Oravecz and her husband, Steve Oravecz, appeal from the trial court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11956 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Anderson
conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the State’s cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20
conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the State’s cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20
State v. Lavelle Allison
appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and sentence modification.[1] We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8475 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and sentence modification.[1] We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195305 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195305 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Schultz
-day statute of limitations thus barring the claim; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2349 - 2017-09-19
-day statute of limitations thus barring the claim; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2349 - 2017-09-19