Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19721 - 19730 of 67052 for ct.

[PDF] State v. Curtis E. Gallion
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-0051-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3471 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State
). 00-0373 5 State v. Dunn, 213 Wis. 2d 363, 368, 570 N.W.2d 614 (Ct. App. 1997). We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2245 - 2017-09-19

2009 WI APP 58
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 2007AP2861 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV1980 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36092 - 2009-05-26

Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
recurrence.” Tennyson v. School Dist., No. 96-1227, unpublished slip op. at 5 (Wis. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Otis B. Bledsoe
598 (Ct. App. 1989). Bledsoe also concedes that Flahive was qualified to make measurements and draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2711 - 2017-09-19

State v. Curtis E. Gallion
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 01-0051-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-1148 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3471 - 2005-03-31

John P. Trachte v. Andrew E. Barrer
. Chimney Repair Co., 140 Wis.2d 187, 191, 409 N.W.2d 423, 426 (Ct. App. 1987), where we held that "[w]hen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8301 - 2005-03-31

Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
that we review de novo. See Wolff v. Town of Jamestown, 229 Wis. 2d 738, 743, 601 N.W.2d 301 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31

James R. Schofield v. Raymond E. Smith
. Appeal Nos. 02-2062 02-2984 Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-55 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5526 - 2005-03-31

James R. Schofield v. Raymond E. Smith
. Appeal Nos. 02-2062 02-2984 Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-55 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5864 - 2005-03-31