Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19721 - 19730 of 30243 for de.

WI App 138 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2305 Complete Title o...
provisions and interpreted by case law. Thus, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See Jay M.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71185 - 2011-10-18

Michelle Ennis v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company
as a matter of law. Section 802.08(2), Stats. We interpret an insurance policy's terms under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13900 - 2005-03-31

Jackson Electric Cooperative v. Brockway Sanitary District No. 1
review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16116 - 2005-03-31

State v. Aaron K. Gibbs
interpretation and our standard of review is de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2556 - 2005-03-31

Alan Berndt v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.
. The Berndts also submitted supporting affidavits of De Vonna Joy, Jeff Scott Olson, and A. Steven Porter, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7248 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837457 - 2024-08-14

Ronald Beauchamp v. James A. Kemmeter
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Estate of Thompson v. Jump River Elec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2283 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
Constitution presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bd. of Regents v. Wis. Pers. Comm'n
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Les Lee R. Lucareli v. Leigh M. Lucareli
? These are questions of law we review de novo. See Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 628, 638, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15686 - 2017-09-21

Jon R. Woodard v. Pammy L. Woodard
conclude that a specific amount of financial support that is not de minimis may be reasonably inferred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7142 - 2005-05-09