Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19721 - 19730 of 29740 for des.
Search results 19721 - 19730 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Mellissa Jacobson
that Jacobson drove the vehicle. We review de novo whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21486 - 2017-09-21
that Jacobson drove the vehicle. We review de novo whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21486 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
defendant has received a fair trial is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137823 - 2015-03-18
defendant has received a fair trial is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137823 - 2015-03-18
State v. Bobbie K.
), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Sheboygan County Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Matthew S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Sheboygan County Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Matthew S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. No. 2014AP2148 8 ¶17 Here, the parties agree that DeBelak’s action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141531 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Id. No. 2014AP2148 8 ¶17 Here, the parties agree that DeBelak’s action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141531 - 2017-09-21
Sonia M. Heinz v. United Services Automobile Association
our review is de novo. See Cardinal v. Leader Nat’l Ins. Co., 166 Wis. 2d 375, 382, 480 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15339 - 2005-03-31
our review is de novo. See Cardinal v. Leader Nat’l Ins. Co., 166 Wis. 2d 375, 382, 480 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15339 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Kenneth M.
performance was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law we decide de novo. Id. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20284 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law we decide de novo. Id. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The ultimate conclusion of whether counsel was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15
The ultimate conclusion of whether counsel was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s application of those facts to the relevant law is de novo, citing Secor v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21
review of the circuit court’s application of those facts to the relevant law is de novo, citing Secor v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on Property Division, Maintenance, Child Support, Contempt, and De Novo Review of Temporary Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133440 - 2015-01-21
on Property Division, Maintenance, Child Support, Contempt, and De Novo Review of Temporary Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133440 - 2015-01-21