Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19731 - 19740 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19731 - 19740 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his related motion for reconsideration. The circuit court concluded that Woods’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
an order denying his related motion for reconsideration. The circuit court concluded that Woods’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
’ claims. We affirm the circuit court’s decision, but we reach that result on different grounds than those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32799 - 2008-05-27
’ claims. We affirm the circuit court’s decision, but we reach that result on different grounds than those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32799 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
appealed and we affirmed his conviction, rejecting his claim that he was entitled to a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57748 - 2014-09-15
appealed and we affirmed his conviction, rejecting his claim that he was entitled to a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims were procedurally barred. This appeal follows. A circuit court has discretion to deny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
claims were procedurally barred. This appeal follows. A circuit court has discretion to deny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
David C. Kanz v. Catherine M. Doyle
appeals from an order dismissing his defamation claim against Catherine M. Doyle and Beth Kushner. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10321 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order dismissing his defamation claim against Catherine M. Doyle and Beth Kushner. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim relating to statutory deadlines. Appellate counsel next addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
be no arguable merit to a claim relating to statutory deadlines. Appellate counsel next addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
, without a hearing, stating that the claims set forth in the motion contained only conclusory allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
, without a hearing, stating that the claims set forth in the motion contained only conclusory allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jimi Thornton v. Walter S. Polacheck, M.D.
his medical malpractice action for failure to prosecute under § 805.03, STATS. Thornton claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8673 - 2017-09-19
his medical malpractice action for failure to prosecute under § 805.03, STATS. Thornton claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8673 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
seized when he was arrested on drug 2 charges. Morton claims that because the City did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48709 - 2014-09-15
seized when he was arrested on drug 2 charges. Morton claims that because the City did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48709 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and that he claimed Robby had assaulted him. It is undisputed that the hospital found no evidence of a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46879 - 2010-02-08
and that he claimed Robby had assaulted him. It is undisputed that the hospital found no evidence of a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46879 - 2010-02-08