Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19731 - 19740 of 65137 for or b.
Search results 19731 - 19740 of 65137 for or b.
Russell C. Winchel v. State Bank of Cross Plains
)(b). This statute applies to motions for reconsideration. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶26, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31
)(b). This statute applies to motions for reconsideration. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶26, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
.” Sec. 973.155(1)(b). Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit under § 973.155 is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141639 - 2015-05-10
.” Sec. 973.155(1)(b). Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit under § 973.155 is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141639 - 2015-05-10
Liduvina Stensland v. Warshafsky
. Therefore, the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable. B. Issue Preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2005-03-31
. Therefore, the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable. B. Issue Preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Anderson
, or (b) his responsiveness or physical dexterity in bringing the boat to a stop and bringing the skier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
, or (b) his responsiveness or physical dexterity in bringing the boat to a stop and bringing the skier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15470 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[B]oth the performance and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
. B. Whether Eisenberg was afforded his right of allocution. Eisenberg also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13357 - 2005-03-31
. B. Whether Eisenberg was afforded his right of allocution. Eisenberg also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13357 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166609 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), as adopted by a City of West Bend municipal ordinance. Lang appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04
. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), as adopted by a City of West Bend municipal ordinance. Lang appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
is clear of traffic within a safe distance”; (b) “in preparation for a left turn”; or (c) “where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54519 - 2014-09-15
is clear of traffic within a safe distance”; (b) “in preparation for a left turn”; or (c) “where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leon A. Franklin
mother, and misdemeanor battery contrary to §§ 948.03(2)(b), 940.30 and 940.19(1), STATS. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12461 - 2017-09-21
mother, and misdemeanor battery contrary to §§ 948.03(2)(b), 940.30 and 940.19(1), STATS. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12461 - 2017-09-21