Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19741 - 19750 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19741 - 19750 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108337 - 2017-09-21
a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108337 - 2017-09-21
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238702 - 2019-04-09
was sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238702 - 2019-04-09
State v. William L. Morford
a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 2001 WI App 155 at ¶9. However, a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 2001 WI App 155 at ¶9. However, a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
application to the facts,” which is a question of law that we ordinarily review de novo. Id., ¶31. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177088 - 2017-09-21
application to the facts,” which is a question of law that we ordinarily review de novo. Id., ¶31. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Herbert H. Timmerman
-3374-CR -5- despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court's ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8417 - 2017-09-19
-3374-CR -5- despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court's ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8417 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶10 The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138491 - 2015-03-30
reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶10 The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138491 - 2015-03-30
Wickes Lumber Company v. Gary D. Everett
court constitute a breach of contract is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19162 - 2005-08-02
court constitute a breach of contract is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19162 - 2005-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
for the suppression motion is an asserted violation of the Fourth Amendment, we decide de novo whether there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34113 - 2008-09-24
for the suppression motion is an asserted violation of the Fourth Amendment, we decide de novo whether there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34113 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
August E. Fabyan v. Town of Delafield
judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16190 - 2017-09-21
judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16190 - 2017-09-21