Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19741 - 19750 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 19741 - 19750 of 74557 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
such as the need for punishment, protection of the public, general deterrence, rehabilitation, restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70202 - 2011-08-24
such as the need for punishment, protection of the public, general deterrence, rehabilitation, restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70202 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163377 - 2017-09-21
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163377 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
)(a), Stats. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date of arrest 12-14-87,” which is four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date of arrest 12-14-87,” which is four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Merkel v. Village of Germantown
, but it declined to change its earlier decision. Merkel then requested a public hearing before the Board which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13273 - 2017-09-21
, but it declined to change its earlier decision. Merkel then requested a public hearing before the Board which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James D. Scherr
of “two or more prior convictions.” We reject this claim because our review of the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8347 - 2017-09-19
of “two or more prior convictions.” We reject this claim because our review of the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8347 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as counsel’s no-merit report, Pineda-Gaeta’s response and a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
the entire record, as well as counsel’s no-merit report, Pineda-Gaeta’s response and a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issue. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207937 - 2018-01-30
issue. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207937 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
, that we will not reverse a trial court’s discretionary decision if the record shows that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12386 - 2017-09-21
, that we will not reverse a trial court’s discretionary decision if the record shows that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12386 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of society. ¶6 The circuit court then stated on the record that it was “concerned to see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107879 - 2014-02-10
of society. ¶6 The circuit court then stated on the record that it was “concerned to see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107879 - 2014-02-10