Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19751 - 19760 of 59339 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19751 - 19760 of 59339 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim that Seaman’s pleas were not validly entered. This court has also analyzed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831898 - 2024-07-31
be no arguable merit to a claim that Seaman’s pleas were not validly entered. This court has also analyzed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831898 - 2024-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the return of $1,872 cash seized when he was arrested on drug charges. Morton claims that because the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48709 - 2010-04-05
for the return of $1,872 cash seized when he was arrested on drug charges. Morton claims that because the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48709 - 2010-04-05
John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
denied this motion on March 24, 2003, without a hearing, stating that the claims set forth in the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26297 - 2006-08-28
denied this motion on March 24, 2003, without a hearing, stating that the claims set forth in the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26297 - 2006-08-28
Steven G. Robillard v. Douglas W. Nardi
At the trial on the Robillards’ claims, the parties offered different theories of the accident. The Robillards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2563 - 2005-03-31
At the trial on the Robillards’ claims, the parties offered different theories of the accident. The Robillards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment dismissing their claim for adverse possession of a disputed parcel of land, and ordering them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31682 - 2014-09-15
a judgment dismissing their claim for adverse possession of a disputed parcel of land, and ordering them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31682 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David C. Kanz v. Catherine M. Doyle
an order dismissing his defamation claim against Catherine M. Doyle and Beth Kushner. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10321 - 2017-09-20
an order dismissing his defamation claim against Catherine M. Doyle and Beth Kushner. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10321 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
’ claims. We affirm the circuit court’s decision, but we reach that result on different grounds than those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32799 - 2008-05-27
’ claims. We affirm the circuit court’s decision, but we reach that result on different grounds than those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32799 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Donald Minniecheske
2 motion, we conclude that Minniecheske’s claims are procedurally barred by § 974.06(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3634 - 2017-09-19
2 motion, we conclude that Minniecheske’s claims are procedurally barred by § 974.06(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3634 - 2017-09-19
Henry D. Witkowski v. County of Milwaukee
claim is barred or preserved depends upon when it accrued and thereby commenced the running
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8474 - 2005-03-31
claim is barred or preserved depends upon when it accrued and thereby commenced the running
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8474 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
liability and alter ego claims, and damages of $574,042.34 for the breach of contract. The defendants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98200 - 2013-06-18
liability and alter ego claims, and damages of $574,042.34 for the breach of contract. The defendants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98200 - 2013-06-18