Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19751 - 19760 of 29832 for des.
Search results 19751 - 19760 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Paul F. Rapala
- are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10875 - 2017-09-20
- are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10875 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 172
The Herros appeal. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29294 - 2014-09-15
The Herros appeal. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29294 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).1 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30296 - 2014-09-15
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).1 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review the court’s decision de novo. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Prissel, 2015 WI App 10, ¶8, 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162063 - 2017-09-21
, we review the court’s decision de novo. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Prissel, 2015 WI App 10, ¶8, 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth W. Pickens
de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711, 714-15 (1985). A sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11033 - 2017-09-19
de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711, 714-15 (1985). A sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11033 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether an error was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Domke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526997 - 2022-06-01
and whether an error was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Domke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526997 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶39. ¶11 We resolve this case under the second standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318157 - 2020-12-23
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶39. ¶11 We resolve this case under the second standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318157 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
State v. Michael Marks
to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 681 N.W.2d 871
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20
to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 681 N.W.2d 871
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is a legal issue subject to a de novo standard of review. Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132031 - 2017-09-21
judgment is a legal issue subject to a de novo standard of review. Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132031 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a demand for a trial de novo in the circuit court. At trial, Mark McKean and Gary Butenhoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250477 - 2019-11-21
filed a demand for a trial de novo in the circuit court. At trial, Mark McKean and Gary Butenhoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250477 - 2019-11-21