Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19751 - 19760 of 65178 for or b.
Search results 19751 - 19760 of 65178 for or b.
James Munroe v. Kenneth Morgan
County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, C.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11027 - 2005-03-31
County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, C.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11027 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barron County v. Vicki L. Buchner
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Buchner claims the arresting officer lacked probable cause to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4542 - 2017-09-20
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Buchner claims the arresting officer lacked probable cause to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4542 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] Porter pled guilty after the trial court denied his suppression motion.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84178 - 2012-07-05
) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] Porter pled guilty after the trial court denied his suppression motion.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84178 - 2012-07-05
DLK Enterprises, Inc. v. Alan J. Rogers
judgment treatment to the motions. See § 802.06(2)(b) and (3), Stats. We discuss the legal issues keeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9410 - 2005-03-31
judgment treatment to the motions. See § 802.06(2)(b) and (3), Stats. We discuss the legal issues keeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9410 - 2005-03-31
Ronald L. Ohlmann v. James Roble
based on Roble’s failure to respond to demands to admit or deny. Section 804.11(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13981 - 2005-03-31
based on Roble’s failure to respond to demands to admit or deny. Section 804.11(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13981 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
each appeal. See Carla B. v. Timothy N., 228 Wis. 2d 695, 698, 598 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1999). Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079261 - 2026-02-18
each appeal. See Carla B. v. Timothy N., 228 Wis. 2d 695, 698, 598 N.W.2d 924 (Ct. App. 1999). Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079261 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846912 - 2024-09-06
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846912 - 2024-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
B. MURRAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Juan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115232 - 2017-09-21
B. MURRAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Juan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115232 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel C. Clussman
in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS. [1] This appeal is decided by a single judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS. [1] This appeal is decided by a single judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
here. B. Officer’s Driving Behavior ¶12 I turn to Owens’ argument that is based on the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191677 - 2017-09-21
here. B. Officer’s Driving Behavior ¶12 I turn to Owens’ argument that is based on the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191677 - 2017-09-21