Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19771 - 19780 of 84336 for case number.
Search results 19771 - 19780 of 84336 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during her testimony referring to the children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during her testimony referring to the children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that she intended to and did mislead the press about the number of signatures on a petition she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=408212 - 2021-08-11
that she intended to and did mislead the press about the number of signatures on a petition she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=408212 - 2021-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267420 - 2020-07-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267420 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Boris Ouchakof
2002 WI 122 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-0875-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16609 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 122 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-0875-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Clayton T. Veldt
offense was void. We disagree and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
offense was void. We disagree and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
of this case law, the City does not explain precisely what legal difference it believes exists between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33186 - 2014-09-15
of this case law, the City does not explain precisely what legal difference it believes exists between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33186 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with the officer’s command to remove his hand. “Various cases have held that darkness, visibility, isolation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
with the officer’s command to remove his hand. “Various cases have held that darkness, visibility, isolation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Juan B. Garcia
it, number one. ¶4 On March 12, 2003, the case was called for trial. Garcia informed the court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
it, number one. ¶4 On March 12, 2003, the case was called for trial. Garcia informed the court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19