Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19781 - 19790 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 19781 - 19790 of 84312 for case number.
State v. Juan B. Garcia
. That is an absolutely firm date, make no mistake about it, number one. ¶4 On March 12, 2003, the case was called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
. That is an absolutely firm date, make no mistake about it, number one. ¶4 On March 12, 2003, the case was called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
area and the number of condo units that could be built there. 2 ¶6 Ultimately, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25
area and the number of condo units that could be built there. 2 ¶6 Ultimately, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11697 - 2017-09-20
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11697 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parental home after a case manager discovered A.S. home alone with her unconscious father. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
parental home after a case manager discovered A.S. home alone with her unconscious father. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
[PDF]
State v. Juan B. Garcia
it, number one. ¶4 On March 12, 2003, the case was called for trial. Garcia informed the court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
it, number one. ¶4 On March 12, 2003, the case was called for trial. Garcia informed the court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6313 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during her testimony referring to the children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during her testimony referring to the children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96-2955-FT, Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that she intended to and did mislead the press about the number of signatures on a petition she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=408212 - 2021-08-11
that she intended to and did mislead the press about the number of signatures on a petition she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=408212 - 2021-08-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15