Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19791 - 19800 of 30243 for de.
Search results 19791 - 19800 of 30243 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. First Weber Grp., Inc. v. Synergy Real Est. Grp., LLC, 2015 WI 34, ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088393 - 2026-03-10
of law that we review de novo. First Weber Grp., Inc. v. Synergy Real Est. Grp., LLC, 2015 WI 34, ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088393 - 2026-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law, which we review de novo, while accepting the findings of fact made by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38501 - 2009-07-28
presents a question of law, which we review de novo, while accepting the findings of fact made by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38501 - 2009-07-28
State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven
, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1997). Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3537 - 2005-03-31
, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1997). Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3537 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24, ¶25, 332 Wis. 2d 571, 798 N.W.2d 199. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134853 - 2015-02-11
review de novo. Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24, ¶25, 332 Wis. 2d 571, 798 N.W.2d 199. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134853 - 2015-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Norman R.
we review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard, Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5321 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard, Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5321 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to No. 2015AP800 4 review the record de novo and to substitute its judgment for that of the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161687 - 2017-09-21
to No. 2015AP800 4 review the record de novo and to substitute its judgment for that of the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ilona Preiss v. Alfred Preiss
not to address this argument in detail because, even if an error were found, it would only be de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16312 - 2017-09-21
not to address this argument in detail because, even if an error were found, it would only be de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. Capitol Fixture & Woodworking Group v. Woodma Distrib., 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28993 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Capitol Fixture & Woodworking Group v. Woodma Distrib., 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Barbara A. DuVal
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Murray v. Murray, 128 Wis.2d 458, 463, 383 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15260 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Murray v. Murray, 128 Wis.2d 458, 463, 383 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The interpretation of trust provisions is a question of law that we review de novo. See Furmanski v. Furmanski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245369 - 2019-08-20
. The interpretation of trust provisions is a question of law that we review de novo. See Furmanski v. Furmanski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245369 - 2019-08-20