Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the sufficiency of the defendant’s allegations de novo, based on the four corners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
. We review the sufficiency of the defendant’s allegations de novo, based on the four corners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Steven Cushman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Steven Cushman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
Clyde Sukanen v. School District of Monroe
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4415 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45665 - 2014-09-15
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45665 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gordon A. Gerke v. Jason R. Coyier
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose R.
are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
Laura Ford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
of the evidence was insufficient to warrant deference, and that we should review the evidence de novo. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11051 - 2005-03-31
of the evidence was insufficient to warrant deference, and that we should review the evidence de novo. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11051 - 2005-03-31
Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See Hunzinger Constr. Co. v. Granite Resources Corp., 196 Wis.2d 327, 332, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31