Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Steven Cushman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Steven Cushman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
[PDF]
Gordon A. Gerke v. Jason R. Coyier
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose R.
are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dante R. Voss
a question of law, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2005-06-01
a question of law, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2005-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21
James Munroe v. Kenneth Morgan
). We review the legal sufficiency of the complaint de novo, without deference to the trial court. Irby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11027 - 2005-03-31
). We review the legal sufficiency of the complaint de novo, without deference to the trial court. Irby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11027 - 2005-03-31
County of Fond du Lac v. Vincent W. English
and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional guarantees. See State v. Harwood, 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18696 - 2005-06-28
and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional guarantees. See State v. Harwood, 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18696 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by Escalona presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454132 - 2021-11-23
by Escalona presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454132 - 2021-11-23