Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 68274 for did.

State v. Jesus Serrano
faced. Serrano did not seek to either withdraw his plea or enforce the plea bargain. Rather, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9718 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Karla R. Merkes
to arrest her. We conclude the officer did have probable cause, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4030 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that his claim was improperly dismissed because the trial court did not grant him an adjournment when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74798 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
. Because the assessment did not include a proper No. 95-0306 -2- account for expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8586 - 2017-09-19

Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
expenses. Because the assessment did not include a proper account for expenses, it was not fixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8586 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the subdivision, but that such unreasonable action did not interfere with McDonald’s use and enjoyment of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51717 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David T. Hyland
thus remand for the State to attempt to show that, regardless of the flawed plea taking, Hyland did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16053 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum
window down. ¶3 The driver did not roll his window down, so Skelton yelled at him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tammy M.
because, as reflected by their verdict, the responsible agency did not “make a reasonable effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24821 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
contends that since he did ultimately agree to submit to a blood test, the purpose of the refusal statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31