Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 69114 for he.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 69114 for he.
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
in an unassigned area. He alleges numerous procedural and substantive errors in the proceeding. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
in an unassigned area. He alleges numerous procedural and substantive errors in the proceeding. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19
2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul G. Fassbender
Fassbender had not completed his sentence. Fassbender argues that, after he was sentenced, he served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7010 - 2005-03-31
Fassbender had not completed his sentence. Fassbender argues that, after he was sentenced, he served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7010 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
is its finding that Cubero violated WIS. ADM. CODE ยง DOC 303.511, being in an unassigned area. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8239 - 2017-09-19
is its finding that Cubero violated WIS. ADM. CODE ยง DOC 303.511, being in an unassigned area. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8239 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul G. Fassbender
not completed his sentence. Fassbender argues that, after he was sentenced, he served a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7010 - 2017-09-20
not completed his sentence. Fassbender argues that, after he was sentenced, he served a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7010 - 2017-09-20
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Marvin E. Marks
be suspended for 60 days for having asserted he maintained a lien on settlement proceeds in violation of SCR 20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16542 - 2005-03-31
be suspended for 60 days for having asserted he maintained a lien on settlement proceeds in violation of SCR 20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16542 - 2005-03-31
State v. Evan Zimmerman
issues on appeal.[1] He argues: (1) The evidence was insufficient to convict him; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5901 - 2005-03-31
issues on appeal.[1] He argues: (1) The evidence was insufficient to convict him; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
following a bench trial at which the circuit court determined that he violated WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273309 - 2020-07-28
following a bench trial at which the circuit court determined that he violated WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273309 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Marvin E. Marks
to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 60 days for having asserted he maintained a lien
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16542 - 2017-09-21
to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 60 days for having asserted he maintained a lien
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16542 - 2017-09-21