Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 69392 for he.

State v. James R. Walz
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), first offense. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31

State v. Paul E. Hawkins
, party to a crime, entered upon his guilty plea. He also appeals an order denying him postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16066 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] The TRC Design Group, Ltd. v. Lou Perrine
of $1600. Christiansen claimed that he did the work to earn the second $1600 and that he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12981 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jonathan C. Segner
), intimidating a witness, and possession of a firearm by a felon (two counts). He was sentenced to seventy years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15355 - 2005-03-31

The TRC Design Group, Ltd. v. Lou Perrine
that he did the work to earn the second $1600 and that he also substantially performed the work listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12981 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
to his trial in this case in the Fond du Lac County circuit court. Mr. Brantner says he should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255296 - 2020-02-25

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Marvin E. Marks
to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 60 days for having asserted he maintained a lien
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16542 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Evan Zimmerman
. Zimmerman raises several issues on appeal. 1 He argues: (1) The evidence was insufficient to convict him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5901 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
following a bench trial at which the circuit court determined that he violated WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273309 - 2020-07-28

State v. Evan Zimmerman
issues on appeal.[1] He argues: (1) The evidence was insufficient to convict him; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5901 - 2005-03-31