Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 1981 - 1990 of 6141 for sheriff.
State v. Richard A. Walford
The facts are not in dispute. On September 25, 1999, Deputy Charles Worm of the Green County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5701 - 2005-03-31
The facts are not in dispute. On September 25, 1999, Deputy Charles Worm of the Green County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
ME-914, Order of Commitment/Extension of Commitment/Dismissal (Fifth Standard)
) The reception facility shall be . Transportation to the facility shall be provided by the sheriff
/formdisplay/ME-914.pdf?formNumber=ME-914&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-04-25
) The reception facility shall be . Transportation to the facility shall be provided by the sheriff
/formdisplay/ME-914.pdf?formNumber=ME-914&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-04-25
County of Outagamie v. David L. Maass
conflicting testimony at the hearing to suppress the results of the blood test. Outagamie County sheriff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11342 - 2005-03-31
conflicting testimony at the hearing to suppress the results of the blood test. Outagamie County sheriff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the sheriff’s department, having already been seized. There is no danger that the officer executing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36547 - 2014-09-15
in the sheriff’s department, having already been seized. There is no danger that the officer executing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36547 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark J. Nagel
evidence on his property. We conclude that it was not and affirm. Deputy Sheriff Steve Coronado
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13731 - 2005-03-31
evidence on his property. We conclude that it was not and affirm. Deputy Sheriff Steve Coronado
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13731 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the sheriff’s sale. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103086 - 2013-10-13
the sheriff’s sale. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103086 - 2013-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
officers located Beard in the business, and he was interviewed by a sheriff’s deputy. Beard confirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695280 - 2023-08-30
officers located Beard in the business, and he was interviewed by a sheriff’s deputy. Beard confirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695280 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶2 A Racine sheriff’s deputy testified that on November 1, 2008, at about 3:38 a.m., he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47938 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 A Racine sheriff’s deputy testified that on November 1, 2008, at about 3:38 a.m., he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47938 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
with the following information: Investigator Price [of the Chippewa County Sheriff's office] reports that after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20396 - 2017-09-21
with the following information: Investigator Price [of the Chippewa County Sheriff's office] reports that after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20396 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
included an affidavit with the following information: Investigator Price [of the Chippewa County Sheriff's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20396 - 2005-11-22
included an affidavit with the following information: Investigator Price [of the Chippewa County Sheriff's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20396 - 2005-11-22