Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19801 - 19810 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 19801 - 19810 of 65726 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we are obliged to search the record to determine whether the sentence could be sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15
, we are obliged to search the record to determine whether the sentence could be sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958883 - 2025-05-28
State v. Robert J. Ferguson
improperly changed his sentence from concurrent to consecutive, three years after the fact. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12009 - 2005-03-31
improperly changed his sentence from concurrent to consecutive, three years after the fact. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12009 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert John Kotz
that there is not a competent evidentiary basis for granting the mistrial. It reasons that the record consists merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
that there is not a competent evidentiary basis for granting the mistrial. It reasons that the record consists merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and a restitution hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude at Nos. 2019AP1536
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319626 - 2020-12-30
and a restitution hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude at Nos. 2019AP1536
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319626 - 2020-12-30
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Barnes could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141369 - 2015-05-04
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Barnes could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141369 - 2015-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
.[3] The totality of the facts presented by the record here are such that a reasonable officer would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31637 - 2008-01-29
.[3] The totality of the facts presented by the record here are such that a reasonable officer would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31637 - 2008-01-29
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117321 - 2014-07-14
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117321 - 2014-07-14