Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19801 - 19810 of 64190 for records.
Search results 19801 - 19810 of 64190 for records.
State v. Mark M. Loutsch
decision on the facts of record or on the proper legal standard. State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶19, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
decision on the facts of record or on the proper legal standard. State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶19, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
principles and facts of record. Id., ¶22. The factors the court is to consider are listed in Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58173 - 2014-09-15
principles and facts of record. Id., ¶22. The factors the court is to consider are listed in Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58173 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107807 - 2014-02-10
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107807 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon consideration of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917934 - 2025-02-26
not responded. Upon consideration of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917934 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252392 - 2020-01-10
considering the report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252392 - 2020-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816263 - 2024-06-20
upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816263 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Hagedorn, JJ. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212379 - 2018-05-03
) Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Hagedorn, JJ. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212379 - 2018-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for resentencing. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134316 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for resentencing. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134316 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record, we affirm the judgment because there is no arguable merit to any issue that can be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
of the record, we affirm the judgment because there is no arguable merit to any issue that can be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26