Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19801 - 19810 of 46967 for show's.
Search results 19801 - 19810 of 46967 for show's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiency, Freeman must show that trial counsel’s actions or omissions were “professionally unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185298 - 2017-09-21
deficiency, Freeman must show that trial counsel’s actions or omissions were “professionally unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185298 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Hoven v. Kelble, 79 Wis. 2d 444, 449, 256 N.W.2d 379 (1977). The required showings for application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32640 - 2008-05-13
. Hoven v. Kelble, 79 Wis. 2d 444, 449, 256 N.W.2d 379 (1977). The required showings for application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32640 - 2008-05-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
who seeks to withdraw a plea after sentencing has the burden of showing by ‘clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39848 - 2014-09-15
who seeks to withdraw a plea after sentencing has the burden of showing by ‘clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39848 - 2014-09-15
Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
shows that prior to the filing of the request for substitution, the parties were contesting whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4819 - 2005-03-31
shows that prior to the filing of the request for substitution, the parties were contesting whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Next, under WIS. STAT. § 51.61(1)(g)4., the County needed to show that the “advantages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136872 - 2017-09-21
Next, under WIS. STAT. § 51.61(1)(g)4., the County needed to show that the “advantages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 277, for its discussion of the required showing of dangerousness under § 51.20(1)(a)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264683 - 2020-06-17
N.W.2d 277, for its discussion of the required showing of dangerousness under § 51.20(1)(a)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264683 - 2020-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2017AP2402 7 ¶16 The Islanders did not support their motion with evidentiary material showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240937 - 2019-05-22
. No. 2017AP2402 7 ¶16 The Islanders did not support their motion with evidentiary material showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240937 - 2019-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
effectiveness. To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show deficient performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209155 - 2018-03-07
effectiveness. To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show deficient performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209155 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 906 (citation omitted). “One way for a defendant to meet this burden is to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
N.W.2d 906 (citation omitted). “One way for a defendant to meet this burden is to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward T.
a showing of good cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21562 - 2017-09-21
a showing of good cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21562 - 2017-09-21