Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19811 - 19820 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 19811 - 19820 of 65143 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 948.025(1)(b).[1] On the morning of the scheduled trial, the parties reached a plea agreement. Shrum’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
. § 948.025(1)(b).[1] On the morning of the scheduled trial, the parties reached a plea agreement. Shrum’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Cheryl E.
County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Cheryl E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7671 - 2005-03-31
County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Cheryl E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Morris
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13251 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 345.20(2)(a) provides: “Except as provided in par. (b), the apprehension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
of an 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 345.20(2)(a) provides: “Except as provided in par. (b), the apprehension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Delbert L. Manke
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), STATS. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court dismissed several other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9400 - 2017-09-19
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), STATS. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court dismissed several other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9400 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
, for his third OWI, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), and his third PAC, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19
, for his third OWI, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), and his third PAC, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Is selling fruit door-to-door to raise money for a charitable organization a de minimis activity?
B below, the Committee finds that the proposed activity does not constitute a de minimis fund
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886 - 2017-09-20
B below, the Committee finds that the proposed activity does not constitute a de minimis fund
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Gordon Hammer
to §§ 943.10(2)(d), 939.05, 939.63, No. 96-3084-CR 2 940.225(1)(c), and 943.32(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11618 - 2017-09-19
to §§ 943.10(2)(d), 939.05, 939.63, No. 96-3084-CR 2 940.225(1)(c), and 943.32(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11618 - 2017-09-19
State v. Armando M. Tia
)(b), Stats. We affirm. The criminal complaint alleged that on June 14, 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8102 - 2005-03-31
)(b), Stats. We affirm. The criminal complaint alleged that on June 14, 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Taylor
that the lineup was “impermissibly suggestive.” B. Sufficiency of the evidence. 1. Standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11546 - 2017-09-19
that the lineup was “impermissibly suggestive.” B. Sufficiency of the evidence. 1. Standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11546 - 2017-09-19