Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19821 - 19830 of 30243 for de.
Search results 19821 - 19830 of 30243 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Jamie M. Grosse
double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thierfelder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11116 - 2017-09-19
double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thierfelder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to arrest presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91694 - 2014-09-15
to arrest presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2479 3 sufficiency of the motion de novo. State v. Sulla, 2016 WI 46, ¶23, 369 Wis. 2d 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206458 - 2018-01-03
. No. 2015AP2479 3 sufficiency of the motion de novo. State v. Sulla, 2016 WI 46, ¶23, 369 Wis. 2d 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206458 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in their entirety with prejudice. Wimberger appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
in their entirety with prejudice. Wimberger appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Aaron Evans
act is authorized by statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Schmaling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15946 - 2017-09-21
act is authorized by statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Schmaling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15946 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88864 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88864 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. 3 ¶9 Undraitis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142334 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. 3 ¶9 Undraitis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s application of those facts to the relevant law is de novo, citing Secor v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21
review of the circuit court’s application of those facts to the relevant law is de novo, citing Secor v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Young, 212 Wis. 2d at 424. No. 2017AP296-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193662 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Young, 212 Wis. 2d at 424. No. 2017AP296-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a defendant has made such a showing is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Robles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191510 - 2017-09-21
. Whether a defendant has made such a showing is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Robles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191510 - 2017-09-21