Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 29828 for des.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 29828 for des.
Les Lee R. Lucareli v. Leigh M. Lucareli
authority to do so? These are questions of law we review de novo. See Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15686 - 2010-07-26
authority to do so? These are questions of law we review de novo. See Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15686 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2008 WI App 18, ¶7, 307 Wis. 2d 754, 746 N.W.2d 553. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34126 - 2008-10-08
reviewed de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2008 WI App 18, ¶7, 307 Wis. 2d 754, 746 N.W.2d 553. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34126 - 2008-10-08
State v. Edward Parker
of double jeopardy and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31
of double jeopardy and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan E. Baker
for jail incarceration time. These are questions of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7346 - 2005-03-31
for jail incarceration time. These are questions of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7346 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan E. Baker
for jail incarceration time. These are questions of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7347 - 2005-03-31
for jail incarceration time. These are questions of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7347 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶10 The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138491 - 2015-03-30
reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶10 The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138491 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465863 - 2021-12-21
was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465863 - 2021-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
standard of probable cause is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ellenbecker, 159 Wis. 2d 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46028 - 2010-01-19
standard of probable cause is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ellenbecker, 159 Wis. 2d 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46028 - 2010-01-19