Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 33989 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
of habeas corpus, which was dismissed by the trial court. In 2004, Kelley filed a Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31767 - 2008-02-11
of habeas corpus, which was dismissed by the trial court. In 2004, Kelley filed a Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31767 - 2008-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charge was dismissed and read-in. The circuit court sentenced him to 60 days in the House
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
charge was dismissed and read-in. The circuit court sentenced him to 60 days in the House
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
Carl Eichorn v. Coakley Brothers Company
Coakley’s motion and entered an order dismissing Eichorn’s complaint and awarding costs to Coakley. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6011 - 2017-09-19
Coakley’s motion and entered an order dismissing Eichorn’s complaint and awarding costs to Coakley. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
and three of the home contracting charges. The remaining counts were dismissed, but they were read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11446 - 2017-09-19
and three of the home contracting charges. The remaining counts were dismissed, but they were read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11446 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis C. Gandy
. Since no alternative test was requested, the trial court dismissed the motion to suppress. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16159 - 2017-09-21
. Since no alternative test was requested, the trial court dismissed the motion to suppress. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied, and these appeals are dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139093 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied, and these appeals are dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
without the repeater enhancer. The State recommended that the circuit court dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480703 - 2022-02-08
without the repeater enhancer. The State recommended that the circuit court dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480703 - 2022-02-08
2007 WI App 34
01-25-2007 Dismissed as moot 2006AP001803 State v. Mark J. Staats
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28440 - 2007-03-11
01-25-2007 Dismissed as moot 2006AP001803 State v. Mark J. Staats
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28440 - 2007-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
). The circuit court summarily dismissed Scheel’s motion in an order dated October 29, 2013, for the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21
). The circuit court summarily dismissed Scheel’s motion in an order dated October 29, 2013, for the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21
Carl Eichorn v. Coakley Brothers Company
or operated by Coakley. Thus, the circuit court granted Coakley’s motion and entered an order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6011 - 2005-03-31
or operated by Coakley. Thus, the circuit court granted Coakley’s motion and entered an order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6011 - 2005-03-31