Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 64190 for records.
Search results 19831 - 19840 of 64190 for records.
[PDF]
Thomas Ponchik v. Jeffrey Endicott
the imposition of discipline on the grounds that “the record contains insufficient evidence upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14228 - 2014-09-15
the imposition of discipline on the grounds that “the record contains insufficient evidence upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the parties’ submissions and the record, this court will grant the requested relief. In December 2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589683 - 2022-11-15
of the parties’ submissions and the record, this court will grant the requested relief. In December 2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589683 - 2022-11-15
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10140 - 2017-09-19
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10140 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
Jill L. Schwenkhoff v. Ronald O. Schwenkhoff
in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure it used for her former husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7915 - 2005-03-31
in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure it used for her former husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709581 - 2023-10-04
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709581 - 2023-10-04
Traci J. Purdy v. Brian M. Purdy
.2d 701 (Ct. App. 1994). We affirm discretionary determinations if they are based on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
.2d 701 (Ct. App. 1994). We affirm discretionary determinations if they are based on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Myers
that the record on appeal does not establish that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3310 - 2005-03-31
that the record on appeal does not establish that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3310 - 2005-03-31
Waterford Bank v. Kevin J. Kimball
in the summary judgment record, we reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
in the summary judgment record, we reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31