Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19841 - 19850 of 34328 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Renovasi Rumah Tipe 36 Bertingkat Berbah Sleman.

Kenosha County v. Michael H. Hines
and disbursements, totaling $81.23. Hines appeals. In ordinance cases, the county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12056 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the date he posted cash bond. 2 In January 2018, Gordon filed a pro se motion seeking a total of 194
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498489 - 2022-03-23

[PDF] Scott Alan Ludtke v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
on the total amount of time remaining on his original sentence. ¶3 In February 1996, Ludtke was again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15997 - 2017-09-21

State v. Margaret Christensen
.” State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 55, 556 N.W.2d 681, 684 (1996). We look to the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15392 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John A. Rooyakkers v. Village of Little Chute
assessed a total of $346.50 and the Stricks were assessed $631.40. Both the Rooyakkers and the Stricks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8704 - 2017-09-19

Barbara Ann Villwock v. Robert M. Villwock
the contribution over time. It found the total fees reasonable. Additionally, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11577 - 2005-03-31

Diane L. Guse v. Ronald C. Guse
. Equally dividing the parties' total income is the starting point for determining maintenance in a long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9216 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alexander Stocks
. The security officers discovered four bottles of the Eau De Toilette in Stocks’ bag, totaling $100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
it concludes, after examining the totality of the circumstances, there are compelling equitable reasons why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65643 - 2011-06-13

East of the River Enterprises II, L.L.C. v. City of Hudson
an unlawful prior restraint on freedom of expression because they would have the effect of totally suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16101 - 2005-03-31