Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19841 - 19850 of 69871 for his.
Search results 19841 - 19850 of 69871 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
in his civil complaint. We affirm. ¶2 Stanton first argues that Minnesota officials violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
in his civil complaint. We affirm. ¶2 Stanton first argues that Minnesota officials violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals several orders dismissing the defendants named in his civil complaint. We affirm. ¶2 Stanton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15
appeals several orders dismissing the defendants named in his civil complaint. We affirm. ¶2 Stanton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not believe he needs antipsychotic medication. J.K.’s untreated schizophrenia impairs his judgment, causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218808 - 2018-09-12
not believe he needs antipsychotic medication. J.K.’s untreated schizophrenia impairs his judgment, causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218808 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
weapon. He contends that the circuit court should have suppressed his statement to police. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217402 - 2018-08-15
weapon. He contends that the circuit court should have suppressed his statement to police. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217402 - 2018-08-15
CA Blank Order
filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Winarski to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92170 - 2013-01-28
filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Winarski to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92170 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of a judgment dissolving his marriage to Linda Johnson.[1] Carl argues the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10
of a judgment dissolving his marriage to Linda Johnson.[1] Carl argues the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10
State v. Joseph Van Beek
by denying his motion to suppress evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3581 - 2005-03-31
by denying his motion to suppress evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3581 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry McMahon
term. McMahon cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his plea because he knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13061 - 2005-03-31
term. McMahon cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his plea because he knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13061 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Alil Azizi appeals from an order denying his motion for plea withdrawal predicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29961 - 2007-08-13
PER CURIAM. Alil Azizi appeals from an order denying his motion for plea withdrawal predicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29961 - 2007-08-13
CA Blank Order
for Michael Swetlik filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Swetlik to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19
for Michael Swetlik filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Swetlik to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19