Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19851 - 19860 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19851 - 19860 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Willie B.
. These cases, although appealed separately, were consolidated for purposes of disposition. Latrina claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7199 - 2005-03-31
. These cases, although appealed separately, were consolidated for purposes of disposition. Latrina claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7199 - 2005-03-31
State v. Latrina W.
. These cases, although appealed separately, were consolidated for purposes of disposition. Latrina claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31
. These cases, although appealed separately, were consolidated for purposes of disposition. Latrina claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ferdinand J. Gunther v. Bernard J. Tworek
on his claim that Gunther’s action was frivolous. Finally, Tworek asks this court either to strike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7163 - 2017-09-20
on his claim that Gunther’s action was frivolous. Finally, Tworek asks this court either to strike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7163 - 2017-09-20
State v. Latrina W.
. These cases, although appealed separately, were consolidated for purposes of disposition. Latrina claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7151 - 2005-03-31
. These cases, although appealed separately, were consolidated for purposes of disposition. Latrina claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tele-Port, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.
a judgment dismissing its claims against Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., and Car Phones+, Inc. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3083 - 2017-09-20
a judgment dismissing its claims against Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., and Car Phones+, Inc. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3083 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael Doud
to pay $107,412.51 in restitution to four of his victims. Doud claims the trial court erred in ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2015-03-08
to pay $107,412.51 in restitution to four of his victims. Doud claims the trial court erred in ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2015-03-08
State v. Carl R. Kramer
that Kramer established a prima facie claim of selective prosecution. We disagree, however, with the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17554 - 2005-03-31
that Kramer established a prima facie claim of selective prosecution. We disagree, however, with the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
claim fails. Accordingly, we affirm. No. 2019AP411-CR 3 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339517 - 2021-02-23
claim fails. Accordingly, we affirm. No. 2019AP411-CR 3 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339517 - 2021-02-23
[PDF]
Christina Holman v. Family Health Plan
because there was a possibility that Family Health Plan might assert a claim for subrogation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17269 - 2017-09-21
because there was a possibility that Family Health Plan might assert a claim for subrogation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chaunte Ott
four claims of No. 97-0579-CR 2 error: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21
four claims of No. 97-0579-CR 2 error: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21