Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19861 - 19870 of 82889 for case codes/1000.
Search results 19861 - 19870 of 82889 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
discovery [sic], look through my case, know my charges. I don’t feel [trial counsel is] representing me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36772 - 2014-09-15
discovery [sic], look through my case, know my charges. I don’t feel [trial counsel is] representing me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36772 - 2014-09-15
George Harrison v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11010 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11010 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 47
2008 WI App 47 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1019-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31842 - 2008-03-18
2008 WI App 47 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1019-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31842 - 2008-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). During the required “prove up,” the ongoing case manager from Children’s of Wisconsin—the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573740 - 2022-10-04
). During the required “prove up,” the ongoing case manager from Children’s of Wisconsin—the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573740 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Aschenbrenner acknowledges a recent federal case supporting the State’s view, but asks that we include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
. Aschenbrenner acknowledges a recent federal case supporting the State’s view, but asks that we include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as potential witnesses during its case-in-chief. ¶6 The State’s first witness, the phlebotomist who took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
as potential witnesses during its case-in-chief. ¶6 The State’s first witness, the phlebotomist who took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misdemeanor cases that have been consolidated for purposes of appeal: a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697751 - 2023-08-31
misdemeanor cases that have been consolidated for purposes of appeal: a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697751 - 2023-08-31
State v. David W. Oakley
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1099-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17389 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1099-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17389 - 2005-03-31
wi APp 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1514-CR Complete Title...
2013 wi APp 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1514-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96270 - 2014-03-09
2013 wi APp 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1514-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96270 - 2014-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and there was an insufficient basis for counsel to withdraw. ¶4 The case was subsequently tried to a jury in April 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417972 - 2021-08-31
and there was an insufficient basis for counsel to withdraw. ¶4 The case was subsequently tried to a jury in April 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417972 - 2021-08-31