Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19861 - 19870 of 82950 for case search.
Search results 19861 - 19870 of 82950 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case involved a school administration building, which is not included in the definition of “school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012220 - 2025-09-18
the case involved a school administration building, which is not included in the definition of “school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012220 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Robert Carnemolla
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2928-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2928-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
Sandra Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-3015 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17069 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-3015 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 40
2013 WI APP 40 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92247 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI APP 40 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92247 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert Carnemolla
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2928-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2928-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. We reject these arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518923 - 2022-05-10
in this case. We reject these arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518923 - 2022-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representing him in the Waukesha County case. On April 9, 2012, Stangler informed the firm that he had filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142778 - 2017-09-21
representing him in the Waukesha County case. On April 9, 2012, Stangler informed the firm that he had filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alcohol concentration (PAC), 8th offense in Rock County case No. 2013CF188 (Rock I). Clark was released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168829 - 2017-09-21
alcohol concentration (PAC), 8th offense in Rock County case No. 2013CF188 (Rock I). Clark was released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - May 2020
809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days stated
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259737 - 2020-05-04
809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days stated
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259737 - 2020-05-04
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - May 2021
to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343873 - 2021-03-04
to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343873 - 2021-03-04