Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 30242 for de.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
the court’s findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795341 - 2024-05-02
the court’s findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795341 - 2024-05-02
[PDF]
La Crosse County DHS v. Juan P.
conference. This is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24670 - 2017-09-21
conference. This is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24670 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dale Marek v. David H. Schwarz
to notify his agent of any involvement in an intimate relationship—is de minimis because the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24978 - 2017-09-21
to notify his agent of any involvement in an intimate relationship—is de minimis because the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stephen P. Gautschi
is fundamental or technical is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error is merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21
is fundamental or technical is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error is merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110486 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110486 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter A. Moss
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason W.T.
Whether a person is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law this court reviews de novo, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5038 - 2005-03-31
Whether a person is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law this court reviews de novo, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5038 - 2005-03-31
Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
omitted). Our review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31
omitted). Our review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jack Williams
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31
Ray A. Peterson v. Department of Industry
) for a discussion of the great weight, due weight and de novo standards of review. [6] Because Wisconsin’s Open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11763 - 2005-03-31
) for a discussion of the great weight, due weight and de novo standards of review. [6] Because Wisconsin’s Open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11763 - 2005-03-31