Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 70147 for his.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 70147 for his.
State v. Larry A. Tollefson
and disorderly conduct for an incident in which he struck and poured beer on his girlfriend. Pursuant to a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31
and disorderly conduct for an incident in which he struck and poured beer on his girlfriend. Pursuant to a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
., appeals from an order denying relief from the revocation of his operating privilege due to his refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34713 - 2014-09-15
., appeals from an order denying relief from the revocation of his operating privilege due to his refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jason A. Krysheski
was returning to the scene when his vehicle collided with Krysheski’s. Krysheski climbed out of his truck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21
was returning to the scene when his vehicle collided with Krysheski’s. Krysheski climbed out of his truck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for Michael Swetlik filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Swetlik to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19
for Michael Swetlik filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Swetlik to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 940.20(1) (2021-22).1 Smith was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733540 - 2023-11-28
. STAT. § 940.20(1) (2021-22).1 Smith was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733540 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Jerry McMahon
to withdraw his plea because he knowingly and voluntarily pleaded no contest. Before accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13061 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw his plea because he knowingly and voluntarily pleaded no contest. Before accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13061 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph Van Beek
by denying his motion to suppress evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3581 - 2005-03-31
by denying his motion to suppress evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
weapon. He contends that the circuit court should have suppressed his statement to police. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217402 - 2018-08-15
weapon. He contends that the circuit court should have suppressed his statement to police. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217402 - 2018-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in his civil complaint. We affirm. ¶2 Stanton first argues that Minnesota officials violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
in his civil complaint. We affirm. ¶2 Stanton first argues that Minnesota officials violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the State when revoked, and failed to receive all of the credit due against his remaining sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
of the State when revoked, and failed to receive all of the credit due against his remaining sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15