Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 19871 - 19880 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Thomas J. Paters
as the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Act (PECFA). Paters allegedly billed for non-existent work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9500 - 2005-03-31
as the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Act (PECFA). Paters allegedly billed for non-existent work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
because the Village “worked” it for more than ten years. More specifically, the Village contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57087 - 2014-09-15
because the Village “worked” it for more than ten years. More specifically, the Village contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57087 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ellen C. Voie v. Thomas M. Pliska
, while also working for the family trucking business and later for an accounting firm. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5733 - 2017-09-19
, while also working for the family trucking business and later for an accounting firm. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5733 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Paters
as the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Act (PECFA). Paters allegedly billed for non-existent work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9500 - 2017-09-19
as the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Act (PECFA). Paters allegedly billed for non-existent work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9500 - 2017-09-19
Ellen C. Voie v. Thomas M. Pliska
working for the family trucking business and later for an accounting firm. The record suggests that Ellen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5733 - 2005-03-31
working for the family trucking business and later for an accounting firm. The record suggests that Ellen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5733 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Anderson
. In analyzing a multiplicity issue, we employ a two-pronged test. See id. The first prong requires that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
. In analyzing a multiplicity issue, we employ a two-pronged test. See id. The first prong requires that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marcus M.
tested positive for cocaine. After the court denied Marcus’s motion to suppress this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15694 - 2017-09-21
tested positive for cocaine. After the court denied Marcus’s motion to suppress this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
-CR; 97-1329-CR & 97-1330-CR 6 evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12451 - 2017-09-21
-CR; 97-1329-CR & 97-1330-CR 6 evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Manitowoc v. Debora A. Ackley
that she perform field sobriety tests and a preliminary breath test. Ackley failed the tests and Hyler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2288 - 2017-09-19
that she perform field sobriety tests and a preliminary breath test. Ackley failed the tests and Hyler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2288 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the postconviction DNA testing statute. The court also rejected that motion, finding that the statute did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
the postconviction DNA testing statute. The court also rejected that motion, finding that the statute did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12