Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19881 - 19890 of 56622 for General Account Probate.

COURT OF APPEALS
Gaustad’s pleas and imposed thirty months of probation. Gaustad did not file a direct appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52099 - 2010-07-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the recordings as conversations between herself and Cromwell. 3 References to Cromwell’s probation status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109900 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel. Case law does not establish a right to counsel on review of revocation of probation or parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79020 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
relating to absconding set forth in the DOC’s “Probation and Parole Operations Manual.”[7] L’Minggio’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11

State v. Linda Lacey
is incorporated into court’s sentence or probation order) and Wis. Stat. § 973.20(13)(c)4 (court commissioner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6992 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Griggs and Maurice Sanders. Griggs was a probation agent supervising an individual, who, as far
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74183 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
withheld sentence and imposed three years of probation, with sixty days of jail as a condition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214493 - 2018-06-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or probation conditions of “house arrest,” and her own “house was on the line for that.” ¶17 Ogren’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333497 - 2021-02-09

COURT OF APPEALS
probation or parole status could be more relevant than prejudicial). The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109900 - 2014-04-02

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
to counsel on review of revocation of probation or parole. See State ex rel. Griffin v. Smith, 2004 WI 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79020 - 2012-03-05