Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19881 - 19890 of 28812 for f.

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance have any merit, he has no grounds to assert postconviction-lawyer ineffectiveness.[2] F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07

[PDF] JoAnne M.N. v. Eau Claire County Department of Human Services
, 2002, Mitchell was placed in the home of his aunt and uncle, Patricia and Tony F. Mitchell was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7543 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f) Whether the child will be able to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240496 - 2019-05-09

State v. Taurius S. Fluker
://www.crimelynx.com/justseen.html; see also Elizabeth F. Loftus, Eyewitness Testimony ch. 4 (1979), available at http
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Karen A.O.
) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10931 - 2017-09-20

State v. Paul L. Vogel
as provided in par. (f), shall be fined not less than $600 nor more than $2,000 and imprisoned for not less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31

wI APP 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1578 Complete Title of...
of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mark L. Thomsen and Sarah F. Kaas of Cannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107521 - 2014-03-25

Eldon Boddie v. David H. Schwarz
are impaired by the revocation." United States ex rel. Sims v. Sielaff, 563 F.2d 821, 826 (7th Cir. 1977
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11271 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. (f) Whether the child will be able to enter into a more stable and permanent family relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718350 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] NOTICE
on relevant considerations and accurate information.” Id., ¶26 (quoting Welch v. Lane, 738 F.2d 863 (7th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53663 - 2014-09-15