Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19891 - 19900 of 83471 for case codes/1000.

Staci J. Schwittay v. Sheboygan Falls Mutual Ins. Co.
2001 WI App 140 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-2445 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3005 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott J. Kilcoyne
: In this case, as in most sexual assault cases, there are no witnesses to the events other than the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12744 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Release Programs in connection with the prison sentence ordered in Kenosha County case No. 2011CF179
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147266 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Juan Mata
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2895-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14602 - 2017-09-21

State v. Equinees Boyles
that the State withheld a psychological report prepared in a separate juvenile case involving Renee. The report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12790 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 91
2011 WI APP 91 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP1447
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64393 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
for more than a year under a CHIPS 2 order. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18684 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2006
in Waukesha). The Court of Appeals may certify cases that cannot be decided by applying current Wisconsin
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21643 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Motion to Dismiss by the Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senators Respondents
, Intervenors-Respondents. MOTION TO DISMISS CASE AS MOOT BY INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0311motiondismiss.pdf - 2024-03-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the case and was beyond the scope of this court’s remand mandate, and because the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156584 - 2017-09-21