Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19891 - 19900 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 19891 - 19900 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
, with costs, and dismissed the Eggers’ case with prejudice. Cumberland sent notices of entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
, with costs, and dismissed the Eggers’ case with prejudice. Cumberland sent notices of entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Review-Memo
- 1 - WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES SEPTEMBER 2024 The cases
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845221 - 2024-08-29
- 1 - WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES SEPTEMBER 2024 The cases
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845221 - 2024-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
58. In this case, the court was required to base its award on a determination of the prevailing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55525 - 2010-10-13
58. In this case, the court was required to base its award on a determination of the prevailing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55525 - 2010-10-13
George Harrison v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11010 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11010 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as potential witnesses during its case-in-chief. ¶6 The State’s first witness, the phlebotomist who took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
as potential witnesses during its case-in-chief. ¶6 The State’s first witness, the phlebotomist who took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Aschenbrenner acknowledges a recent federal case supporting the State’s view, but asks that we include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
. Aschenbrenner acknowledges a recent federal case supporting the State’s view, but asks that we include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Thiensville v. Jon R. Olsen
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2055 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14276 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2055 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14276 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). During the required “prove up,” the ongoing case manager from Children’s of Wisconsin—the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573740 - 2022-10-04
). During the required “prove up,” the ongoing case manager from Children’s of Wisconsin—the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573740 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). The parties agree that this case would ordinarily be considered moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54754 - 2014-09-15
WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). The parties agree that this case would ordinarily be considered moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54754 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 47
2008 WI App 47 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1019-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31842 - 2008-03-18
2008 WI App 47 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1019-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31842 - 2008-03-18

