Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 9854 for WA 08.

COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37252 - 2009-07-07

[PDF] NOTICE
(2007-08). AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:06:08-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
. 07/02/2021 07/08/2021
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407131 - 2021-08-05

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 974.06(4) (2007-08) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-82, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47252 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was required to comply with the requisites of Wis. Stat. § 974.06(4) (2007-08) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47252 - 2010-02-22

[PDF] Dana J. Stadler v. Linda M. Stadler
between the parties. Mack v. Mack, 108 Wis. 2d 604, 607-08, 323 N.W.2d 153 (Ct. App. 1982). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6354 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 941.20(2)(a) (2007-08).1 She was sentenced to thirty-two months’ initial confinement and forty-eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40992 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (2007-08).[1] We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36065 - 2009-04-01

COURT OF APPEALS
as they are supported by credible and substantial evidence. Id.; Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6) (2007-08).[1] We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42500 - 2009-10-21

COURT OF APPEALS
” that the assessor’s valuation was incorrect. Wis. Stat. § 70.47(8)(i) (2007-08).[1] “The court [may] not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45178 - 2010-02-28