Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 10740 for divorce/1000.

[PDF] State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
to deliver it, within 1000 feet of a public school; and of obstructing an officer. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
commenced a divorce action in 1999 and, in 2000, the parties entered into a marital settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79943 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
denying in part his motion to reconsider the property division in a judgment of divorce.[1] He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95341 - 2013-04-10

Elyse Joransen-Hamilton Knutson v. Richard C. Knutson
appeals from that portion of a divorce judgment enforcing a premarital agreement that precluded her from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2790 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of divorce.1 He argues that the “Skeeter” boat should have been excluded from the property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95341 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
extensive treatment in 1998 for temperomandibular joint disorder (TMJ). ¶3 Thomas commenced a divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79943 - 2012-03-27

[PDF] The Estate of Ann M. Ernst v. Dennis John Ernst
preclusion prevents Dennis from asserting sole ownership when he asserted otherwise in an Arizona divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12976 - 2017-09-21

Roger R. Bjork v. Carol Bjork
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Carol Bjork appeals that part of the divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15603 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kimberly Kay Arneson v. Robert Eric Arneson
the circuit court clarified this aspect NO. 97-2509-FT 2 of a previous judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12955 - 2017-09-21

Kimberly Kay Arneson v. Robert Eric Arneson
as exemption) after the circuit court clarified this aspect of a previous judgment of divorce. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12955 - 2005-03-31