Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 55107 for n c.

COURT OF APPEALS
Rule 809.25(3)(c)) (ellipses and bracketing in original). “[A]n appellate court decides whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126353 - 2014-11-11

[PDF] Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
the issue was frivolous, and to make specific findings as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25(3)(c) (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4233 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. LARRY N. SCRUGGS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ADVANCED PROPERTIES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126353 - 2017-09-21

Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c) (1999-2000).[2] ¶2 Upon reconsideration, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4233 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Errata
DISTRICT IV IN THE MATTER OF THE CONDITION OF C. K. S.: PORTAGE COUNTY
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459194 - 2021-11-30

[PDF] Date: July 26, 2010
DC, Inc. v. William J. Actkins Racine 2009AP000145 CR State v. Johnny C. Herring Racine 2009AP002238
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52652 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, WI 53226-3532 Gregory Bates Bates Law Offices P.O. Box 70 Kenosha, WI 53141-0070 C. C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198080 - 2017-10-24

State v. Karen M. Boedecker
review de novo. State v. Holmes, 106 Wis. 2d 31, 41 n.7, 315 N.W.2d 703, 708 n.7 (1982). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4973 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. Judith L. Kuipers, Ex-Chancellor of U.W.L., Douglas N. Hastad, Ex
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36753 - 2009-06-09

[PDF] Clerk SC COA_Layout 1
W i s c o n s i n C o u r t S y s t e m 16 East Capitol Building, P.O. Box 1688, Madison, WI
/courts/resources/docs/sccaclerk.pdf - 2022-10-25