Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 12810 for se.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2018AP423-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eric D. Conner, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239398 - 2019-04-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julie Rhoades, pro se, appeals a February 2013 postdivorce order modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110488 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dennis L. Farr
)—Farr has not advanced any such argument in his briefs. Farr’s Reply Brief In his pro se reply brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Reginald S. Curtis, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117597 - 2014-07-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julie Rhoades, pro se, appeals a February 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pro se instead of seeking new counsel. Prodded by the circuit court, Applewhite did procure new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380667 - 2021-06-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that she was objectively biased is to conclude she was per se biased[.]” Id. The court then stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611642 - 2023-01-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Reginald S. Curtis, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald D. Shampo
completion of a presentence investigation report. ¶3 On September 11, 2000, Shampo, pro se, apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dennis L. Farr
)—Farr has not advanced any such argument in his briefs. Farr’s Reply Brief In his pro se reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11376 - 2017-09-19