Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 46923 for shows.

Frontsheet
grievances. After this court issued an order to show cause in January 2010, Attorney Hicks finally responded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78004 - 2012-02-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the videos showed Mary performing oral sex on a man later determined to be Vogel (although he had used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515933 - 2022-05-03

[PDF] State v. Maurice M. Hardy
showing that the sought-after (..continued) untruthfulness. 3 The State has crafted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8523 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
. ¶10 The referee determined that Attorney Peiss presented no specific facts showing a genuine issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54589 - 2010-09-16

[PDF] NOTICE
declarations during her postconviction hearing showed that her income fell at least $11,550 below the federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44852 - 2014-09-15

State v. David M. Beasley
N.W.2d 711, 714 (1985). The first prong requires that the defendant show that counsel's performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31

State v. David Allen Bruski
on the floor of the front seat. The evidence shows that defendant did not give consent for the bag
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 974.06 claims were barred because he did not show a sufficient reason for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14

COURT OF APPEALS
845 (1990). “The first test requires the defendant to show that his counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33494 - 2008-07-23

State v. Eric T. Scott
review of the record shows that Scott never plainly alleged ineffective assistance before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17891 - 2005-05-02