Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 58455 for speedy trial.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 58455 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Tommy L. Brown has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36404 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Tommy L. Brown has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36404 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
BRENNAN, J.[1] Laura M. appeals from the trial court’s orders terminating her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-10-09
BRENNAN, J.[1] Laura M. appeals from the trial court’s orders terminating her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30973 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30973 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the trial court denied Bivens “his due process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174413 - 2017-09-21
argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the trial court denied Bivens “his due process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174413 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), and from the order denying his postconviction motion. 2 Hare argues that: (1) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117781 - 2017-09-21
), and from the order denying his postconviction motion. 2 Hare argues that: (1) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117781 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his postconviction motion.[2] Hare argues that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117781 - 2014-07-28
the order denying his postconviction motion.[2] Hare argues that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117781 - 2014-07-28
[PDF]
Sandra J. Sorce v. Isadore H. Sorce
judgment. Appellant Isadore H. Sorce contends: (1) that the trial court erred when it calculated child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8440 - 2017-09-19
judgment. Appellant Isadore H. Sorce contends: (1) that the trial court erred when it calculated child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8440 - 2017-09-19
Sandra J. Sorce v. Isadore H. Sorce
. This is an appeal from a divorce judgment. Appellant Isadore H. Sorce contends: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8440 - 2005-03-31
. This is an appeal from a divorce judgment. Appellant Isadore H. Sorce contends: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8440 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Schramm appeals from orders related to a post-verdict amendment of the judgment. Schramm claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2007-10-01
Schramm appeals from orders related to a post-verdict amendment of the judgment. Schramm claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2007-10-01