Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 21451 for warrants.
Search results 1991 - 2000 of 21451 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. Spencer S. Henderson
pursuant to the warrant requirement or an exception to the warrant requirement is an essential part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5512 - 2017-09-19
pursuant to the warrant requirement or an exception to the warrant requirement is an essential part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5512 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60309 - 2014-09-15
that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60309 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the blood draw was taken without a search warrant and, therefore, the burden was on the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42751 - 2009-10-28
that the blood draw was taken without a search warrant and, therefore, the burden was on the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42751 - 2009-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a common sense test” that requires us to decide “whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
is a common sense test” that requires us to decide “whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a common sense test” that requires us to decide “whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
is a common sense test” that requires us to decide “whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Joanie M.H.
was not warranted because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3751 - 2017-09-19
was not warranted because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3751 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60309 - 2011-02-22
and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inference from those facts, objectively warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60309 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Isiah Washington
should be stricken from the record because the arresting officer stated that he had a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12486 - 2017-09-21
should be stricken from the record because the arresting officer stated that he had a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but because Gatlin had requested a lawyer, Wells would instead obtain a search warrant for Gatlin’s DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069632 - 2026-02-03
, but because Gatlin had requested a lawyer, Wells would instead obtain a search warrant for Gatlin’s DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069632 - 2026-02-03
State v. James E. Thomas
The police subsequently obtained a warrant for Thomas’s arrest. On April 3, 1996, the police stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31
The police subsequently obtained a warrant for Thomas’s arrest. On April 3, 1996, the police stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31