Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
on Property Division, Maintenance, Child Support, Contempt, and De Novo Review of Temporary Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133440 - 2006-03-01
on Property Division, Maintenance, Child Support, Contempt, and De Novo Review of Temporary Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133440 - 2006-03-01
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2014-06-05
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2014-06-05
Allen R. Radtke, Jr. v. East Mequon Business Park Limited Partnership
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See M & I First Nat'l Bank v. Episcopal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10395 - 2005-03-31
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See M & I First Nat'l Bank v. Episcopal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara A. DuVal
lacks impartiality is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Murray v. Murray, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15260 - 2005-03-31
lacks impartiality is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Murray v. Murray, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15260 - 2005-03-31
Lillie M. Jones v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31
Maryland Casualty Company v. Evan Ben-Hur
, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476‑77 (1980). We do note, however, that our review of the trial court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8272 - 2010-11-15
, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476‑77 (1980). We do note, however, that our review of the trial court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8272 - 2010-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish probable cause is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2012-02-28
a criminal complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish probable cause is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2012-02-28
2007 WI APP 173
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
2007 WI App 12
. This appeal follows. II. Analysis. ¶4 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27312 - 2007-01-30
. This appeal follows. II. Analysis. ¶4 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27312 - 2007-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2010-06-01
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2010-06-01