Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 29823 for des.
State v. Tan Ngoc Nguyen
to the constitutional principles presents a question of law that we review de novo. Lee, 175 Wis.2d at 354, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8907 - 2005-03-31
to the constitutional principles presents a question of law that we review de novo. Lee, 175 Wis.2d at 354, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2015-06-10
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2015-06-10
Jessica Perra v. Menomonee Mutual Insurance Company
and administrative rule interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation we review de novo. See id. at 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2171 - 2005-03-31
and administrative rule interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation we review de novo. See id. at 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Phillips
constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law which the appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31
constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law which the appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35015 - 2005-03-31
erroneous. Id. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35015 - 2005-03-31
Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
omitted). Our review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31
omitted). Our review of the trial court’s decision is de novo. Id. ¶5 Raz claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI App 59
that we review de novo. See Homeward Bound Servs., Inc. v. Office of the Ins. Comm’r, 2006 WI App 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32059 - 2005-07-20
that we review de novo. See Homeward Bound Servs., Inc. v. Office of the Ins. Comm’r, 2006 WI App 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32059 - 2005-07-20
2007 WI APP 173
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2015-08-18
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2015-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish probable cause is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2009-10-21
a criminal complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish probable cause is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2009-10-21
Axel Albert Johnson v. Holland America Line-Westours, Inc.
). Our review is de novo. We have detailed this procedure in numerous cases and do not repeat it here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11124 - 2005-03-31
). Our review is de novo. We have detailed this procedure in numerous cases and do not repeat it here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11124 - 2005-03-31