Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 40262 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Donald J. Buford
a statement to police indicating that “the gun went off two or three times” and “he didn’t mean for the gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6924 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s statement and that trial counsel employed a reasonable strategy. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80704 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. He also asserts that counsel should have impeached her for prior inconsistent statements to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104257 - 2017-09-21

Thomas L. Koeberl v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
this argument overstates the record. The commission relied in part on Sluss’s statement that “disc disease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4388 - 2005-03-31

State v. James E. Gray
or paraphernalia, and the activities or statements of the person in possession of the controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3785 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
than the record. We remind counsel that an appellant’s brief must include “a statement of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115737 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cleuza Schuh v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
statement by the trial court: “So the burden is on the plaintiffs to have proven that the ring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14026 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
.” The postconviction court concluded that Hernandez was not prejudiced by trial counsel’s statement and that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
were nothing more than delay tactics. In doing so, the court made the following statement, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120918 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 107
when a reasonable person could question the court’s impartiality based on the court’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36536 - 2014-09-15