Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 19901 - 19910 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, including an argument that “focuse[d] entirely on the bullet
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251710 - 2019-12-19
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, including an argument that “focuse[d] entirely on the bullet
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251710 - 2019-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
wife, Linda.3 Wilks’s case proceeded to trial. This appeal centers on Counts 1 and 10. Count 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
wife, Linda.3 Wilks’s case proceeded to trial. This appeal centers on Counts 1 and 10. Count 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied (1) his request to represent himself at trial and (2) his presentence motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195019 - 2017-09-21
erroneously denied (1) his request to represent himself at trial and (2) his presentence motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195019 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying a postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21
and from an order denying a postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
proceeded to a jury trial where it was established that three of the individuals entered the residence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468095 - 2021-12-30
proceeded to a jury trial where it was established that three of the individuals entered the residence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468095 - 2021-12-30
[PDF]
State v. Sabastian Ransom
disagree with Ransom and affirm the judgment and order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 On March 1, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6834 - 2017-09-20
disagree with Ransom and affirm the judgment and order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 On March 1, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6834 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Chad Magolski appeals a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135733 - 2017-09-21
. Chad Magolski appeals a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments on appeal, all related to the circuit court’s striking of his alibi testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21
arguments on appeal, all related to the circuit court’s striking of his alibi testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI App 73
are not void. As such, we affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Mercado and Terry’s amended complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36141 - 2009-05-26
are not void. As such, we affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Mercado and Terry’s amended complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36141 - 2009-05-26
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on “great bodily harm”; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on “great bodily harm”; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11